Libraries, Post-Truth (Lauren Mesley Blog Post #8)
![]() |
| [image source] |
The spread of conspiracy theories online is a fascinating problem, and one that is indicative of a larger phenomenon: post-truth. Researchers Anatoliy Gruzd and Philip Mai published a paper in mid 2020 where they examined how the conspiracy theory tied to the hashtag #FilmYourHospital went viral. This social campaign encouraged users to break quarantine in the early days of the pandemic to film empty parking lots and waiting rooms in their local hospitals to prove that COVID-19 was a hoax. Of course there are many reasons why hospital parking lots and waiting rooms would be empty during a global pandemic—namely because they had closed their doors to visitors and non-emergency appointments to prevent the spread of the virus—but in a post-truth world, this was not a good enough explanation.
I learned about post-truth recently and I think it’s something that should be more on the radar of libraries. Post-truth is the rising phenomenon of people deciding not to believe facts if their feelings and politics do not align with them. For example, the violent crime rate in America is at a historic low. But right wing politicians are insisting that Americans feel more threatened than ever. Objectively, there is less violent crime, and yet because the "average American" may not feel like there is less crime, government budgeting priorities remain favorable to the police, often at the expense of institutions like libraries.
I’m not sure how we ended up here, but I do know that this is of interest to information professionals. As librarians, we study and monitor information behavior, but how will that change when people decide that information is false because it doesn’t reflect their lived reality? How will we serve patrons who don’t believe in science? How do we reason with people if we can’t even agree on what is true?

Comments
Post a Comment